AQC0456

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0456

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0456

The artwork Tritone [1] (D, G#) - Reflexions 8 (AQC0456) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2026-02-04. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 788x1092 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 A3A3A4 15.6 gray steel gray
2 F67430 13.6 orange tomato
3 7B7B7D 13.2 gray grayish purple
4 E55C1A 12.6 orange chocolate
5 173847 12.3 blue darkslategray
6 5B5F5E 9.7 gray dimgray
7 295D79 8.0 blue darkslategrey
8 C6C9C2 7.4 white silver
9 5EB5BC 5.6 blue-green mediumaquamarine
10 8F551B 2.1 orange russet
11 001424 0.3 blue-violet very dark gray [Accent]
12 6B3021 0.3 red-orange russet [Accent]
13 00201E 0.3 green very dark gray [Accent]
14 634504 0.3 yellow-orange russet [Accent]
15 F0F6DA 0.3 yellow-green beige [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
gray 38.5
orange 28.3
blue 20.3
white 7.4
blue-green 5.6
blue-violet 0.3
red-orange 0.3
green 0.3
yellow-orange 0.3
yellow-green 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
001424 blue-violet very dark gray 13.2
6B3021 red-orange russet 33.3
00201E green very dark gray 13.2
634504 yellow-orange russet 39.6
F0F6DA yellow-green beige 14.8

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.17
Mean Local Roughness 0.035
Roughness Uniformity 0.027
Edge Density 0.175
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.215
Gradient Variance 0.059
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.01
Pattern Complexity 0.128
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.681
Spatial Variation 0.117
Texture Consistency 0.626

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.49
Brightness Variance 0.17
Brightness Uniformity 0.653
Brightness Skewness -0.278
Brightness Entropy 7.412
Rms Contrast 0.17
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.659
Mean Local Contrast 0.031
Contrast Uniformity 0.208
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.557
Shadow Percentage 19.979
Midtone Percentage 66.483
Highlight Percentage 13.538
Shadow Clipping 0.01
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.122
Fine Contrast 0.025
Medium Contrast 0.039
Coarse Contrast 0.046
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.55
Edge Contrast 0.215
Contrast Clustering 0.374

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.767
Color Clustering 0.516
Color Transition Smoothness 0.451
Transition Uniformity 0.583
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.009
Mean Saturation 0.447
Saturation Variance 0.122
Low Saturation Ratio 0.444
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.179
High Saturation Ratio 0.377
Saturation Clustering 0.997
Hue Concentration 0.049
Complementary Balance 0.361
Analogous Dominance 0.516
Temperature Bias 0.033

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2023). Tritone (D, G#) - Reflexions 8 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0456.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2023). Tritone (D, G#) - Reflexions 8 - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2023/01/tritone-d-g-reflexions-8_55k.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

30f56aa15af279161942200f66c9c22def1d2beebc29ab7c80f3c687cb5e9691