AQC0521

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0521

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0521

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork D Major9 - Research [1] on Harmony - Variation 1 (AQC0521) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2015x2686 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E7E5E0 25.9 white white
2 D9D6D0 15.9 white lightgray
3 B58F49 9.7 yellow-orange peru
4 777674 9.6 gray gray
5 C6A678 9.3 yellow-orange ochre
6 93928F 8.7 gray grey
7 9B6A3E 6.4 orange burnt sienna
8 BFBAB1 5.5 yellow-orange silver
9 AC8969 4.9 orange rosybrown
10 52504F 3.9 gray darkslategray
11 3B2D2A 0.3 red-orange darkslategray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
white 41.9
yellow-orange 24.5
gray 22.3
orange 11.4
red-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
3B2D2A red-orange darkslategray 7.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.183
Mean Local Roughness 0.023
Roughness Uniformity 0.024
Edge Density 0.133
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.181
Gradient Variance 0.056
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.009
Pattern Complexity 0.133
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.664
Spatial Variation 0.093
Texture Consistency 0.827

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.691
Brightness Variance 0.183
Brightness Uniformity 0.736
Brightness Skewness -0.304
Brightness Entropy 6.929
Rms Contrast 0.183
Michelson Contrast 0.969
Weber Contrast 0.506
Mean Local Contrast 0.025
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 0.984
Effective Dynamic Range 0.506
Shadow Percentage 2.222
Midtone Percentage 46.08
Highlight Percentage 51.698
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.03
Coarse Contrast 0.039
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.323
Edge Contrast 0.181
Contrast Clustering 0.173

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.749
Color Clustering 0.755
Color Transition Smoothness 0.545
Transition Uniformity 0.643
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.013
Mean Saturation 0.181
Saturation Variance 0.051
Low Saturation Ratio 0.699
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.3
High Saturation Ratio 0.001
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.993
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 1.0
Temperature Bias 1.0

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). D Major9 - Research on Harmony - Variation 1 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0521.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/d-major9-research-on-harmony-variation-1_5uu.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

bb9dc244c99bc87fd12e85b23aa79fe68b96997a4ec58b4b756cce3ddc9a8c59