AQC0591

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0591

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0591

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork E Major [1] - Research on Harmony (AQC0591) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2617x3489 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 356CA1 26.1 blue-violet grayish purple
2 2D5D8C 16.6 blue-violet grayish purple
3 4581B3 16.6 blue-violet grayish purple
4 F1C02B 9.1 yellow-orange goldenrod
5 8BC05B 7.6 yellow-green yellowgreen
6 C5CB75 6.7 yellow ochre
7 535A6C 5.9 blue-violet grayish purple
8 E4D6A6 4.6 yellow-orange palegoldenrod
9 79ACD1 4.3 blue cornflowerblue
10 1D1D1C 2.4 gray very dark gray
11 165EC3 0.3 violet royalblue [Accent]
12 75420E 0.3 orange russet [Accent]
13 F0D4D0 0.3 red-orange gainsboro [Accent]
14 E9CED0 0.3 red gainsboro [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-violet 65.2
yellow-orange 13.7
yellow-green 7.6
yellow 6.7
blue 4.3
gray 2.4
violet 0.3
orange 0.3
red-orange 0.3
red 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
165EC3 violet royalblue 61.7
75420E orange russet 42.0
F0D4D0 red-orange gainsboro 10.8
E9CED0 red gainsboro 10.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.178
Mean Local Roughness 0.015
Roughness Uniformity 0.029
Edge Density 0.048
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.115
Gradient Variance 0.08
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.253
Pattern Complexity 0.112
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.637
Spatial Variation 0.079
Texture Consistency 0.555

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.489
Brightness Variance 0.178
Brightness Uniformity 0.635
Brightness Skewness 0.51
Brightness Entropy 6.966
Rms Contrast 0.178
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.572
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.498
Shadow Percentage 11.886
Midtone Percentage 63.62
Highlight Percentage 24.493
Shadow Clipping 0.005
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.009
Medium Contrast 0.021
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.115
Contrast Clustering 0.445

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.75
Color Clustering 0.374
Color Transition Smoothness 0.695
Transition Uniformity 0.456
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.26
Mean Saturation 0.593
Saturation Variance 0.028
Low Saturation Ratio 0.081
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.709
High Saturation Ratio 0.21
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.505
Complementary Balance 0.064
Analogous Dominance 0.709
Temperature Bias -0.552

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). E Major - Research on Harmony — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0591.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/e-major-research-on-harmony_6m2.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

f5fbbc9d443367d925c94c43de360f862e6b4104f525f53b3d56b69249351c2a