AQC0639

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0639

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0639

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork G Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 1 (AQC0639) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1977x2965 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E5730E 20.5 orange chocolate
2 EC7E25 17.4 orange peru
3 84C46B 15.3 yellow-green darkseagreen
4 F58F3C 10.0 orange coral
5 76AD57 9.1 yellow-green yellowgreen
6 0E0F0B 8.1 black black
7 668B41 7.0 yellow-green olivedrab
8 98D980 4.7 yellow-green lightgreen
9 53632B 4.1 yellow-green dark brown
10 2F3425 3.8 yellow-green darkslategray
11 642B1A 0.3 red-orange russet [Accent]
12 876A3A 0.3 yellow-orange burnt sienna [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 47.9
yellow-green 44.0
black 8.1
red-orange 0.3
yellow-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
642B1A red-orange russet 33.2
876A3A yellow-orange burnt sienna 31.4

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.178
Mean Local Roughness 0.024
Roughness Uniformity 0.023
Edge Density 0.129
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.196
Gradient Variance 0.059
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.016
Pattern Complexity 0.109
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.634
Spatial Variation 0.109
Texture Consistency 0.509

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.524
Brightness Variance 0.178
Brightness Uniformity 0.66
Brightness Skewness -1.575
Brightness Entropy 6.769
Rms Contrast 0.178
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.721
Mean Local Contrast 0.026
Contrast Uniformity 0.108
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.647
Shadow Percentage 13.505
Midtone Percentage 73.527
Highlight Percentage 12.967
Shadow Clipping 0.019
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.033
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.196
Contrast Clustering 0.491

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.736
Color Clustering 0.55
Color Transition Smoothness 0.507
Transition Uniformity 0.592
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.019
Mean Saturation 0.647
Saturation Variance 0.064
Low Saturation Ratio 0.09
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.408
High Saturation Ratio 0.502
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.775
Complementary Balance 0.019
Analogous Dominance 0.863
Temperature Bias 0.504

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). G Major - Research on Harmony - Variation 1 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0639.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/g-major-research-on-harmony-variation-1_74q.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

ccab0ecfffb7f62a0f13c980f98377d066b72b4e0fc43f7a544bf56094ddff26