AQC0646

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0646

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0646

Analysis record [3]: Ab minor - Research [1] on Harmony - Variation 2 (AQC0646) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1750x2625 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 AEDC41 33.3 yellow-green yellowgreen
2 2C608E 16.0 blue-violet grayish purple
3 18457A 12.9 blue-violet grayish purple
4 447AA7 8.9 blue-violet grayish purple
5 2E2B40 8.8 violet very dark gray
6 080806 6.9 black black
7 EEE7D4 5.8 yellow antiquewhite
8 CED1BE 3.3 yellow-green lightgray
9 81A7C2 2.3 blue steel gray
10 6F6C57 1.9 yellow dimgray
11 80682B 0.3 yellow-orange burnt sienna [Accent]
12 A56B30 0.3 orange burnt sienna [Accent]
13 B9DCDE 0.3 blue-green powderblue [Accent]
14 649992 0.3 green cadetblue [Accent]
15 61494D 0.3 red dimgray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-violet 37.8
yellow-green 36.7
violet 8.8
yellow 7.6
black 6.9
blue 2.3
yellow-orange 0.3
orange 0.3
blue-green 0.3
green 0.3
red 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
80682B yellow-orange burnt sienna 37.1
A56B30 orange burnt sienna 44.8
B9DCDE blue-green powderblue 12.1
649992 green cadetblue 19.1
61494D red dimgray 11.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.266
Mean Local Roughness 0.024
Roughness Uniformity 0.031
Edge Density 0.111
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.197
Gradient Variance 0.098
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.03
Pattern Complexity 0.127
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.629
Spatial Variation 0.191
Texture Consistency 0.48

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.492
Brightness Variance 0.266
Brightness Uniformity 0.458
Brightness Skewness -0.063
Brightness Entropy 7.365
Rms Contrast 0.266
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.783
Mean Local Contrast 0.027
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.843
Shadow Percentage 35.316
Midtone Percentage 21.851
Highlight Percentage 42.833
Shadow Clipping 0.074
Highlight Clipping 0.018
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.034
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.197
Contrast Clustering 0.52

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.756
Color Clustering 0.697
Color Transition Smoothness 0.484
Transition Uniformity 0.322
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.034
Mean Saturation 0.605
Saturation Variance 0.047
Low Saturation Ratio 0.13
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.442
High Saturation Ratio 0.428
Saturation Clustering 0.997
Hue Concentration 0.319
Complementary Balance 0.098
Analogous Dominance 0.527
Temperature Bias -0.409

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). Ab minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 2 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0646.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/ab-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-2_77g.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

51e522be8a8ef315b8a94886d88e99ae6c80d80237b9438406ba1a1cdcfbfd70