AQC0805

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0805

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0805

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork Ab Octaves [1] - Reflexions 31 (AQC0805) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2441x3255 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 D9DADA 21.5 white gainsboro
2 B3A58F 15.6 yellow-orange rosybrown
3 C1CAE3 13.9 blue-violet lightsteelblue
4 9B8E80 11.8 yellow-orange gray
5 A8B6DE 11.2 blue-violet lightblue
6 C6BAA4 10.8 yellow-orange tan
7 8EA0C9 5.2 blue-violet steel gray
8 7C7164 4.0 yellow-orange dimgray
9 527E9A 3.2 blue grayish purple
10 292A2E 2.8 gray very dark gray
11 170E08 0.3 red-orange black [Accent]
12 E4AE80 0.3 orange burlywood [Accent]
13 62A6B5 0.3 blue-green cadetblue [Accent]
14 7F799D 0.3 violet dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 42.3
blue-violet 30.3
white 21.5
blue 3.2
gray 2.8
red-orange 0.3
orange 0.3
blue-green 0.3
violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
170E08 red-orange black 5.0
E4AE80 orange burlywood 34.0
62A6B5 blue-green cadetblue 22.7
7F799D violet dusty mauve 20.6

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.151
Mean Local Roughness 0.021
Roughness Uniformity 0.019
Edge Density 0.112
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.171
Gradient Variance 0.043
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.012
Pattern Complexity 0.116
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.62
Spatial Variation 0.064
Texture Consistency 0.615

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.694
Brightness Variance 0.151
Brightness Uniformity 0.783
Brightness Skewness -1.333
Brightness Entropy 7.033
Rms Contrast 0.151
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.402
Mean Local Contrast 0.022
Contrast Uniformity 0.165
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.443
Shadow Percentage 2.993
Midtone Percentage 32.928
Highlight Percentage 64.08
Shadow Clipping 0.002
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.011
Medium Contrast 0.028
Coarse Contrast 0.043
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.26
Edge Contrast 0.171
Contrast Clustering 0.385

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.714
Color Clustering 0.763
Color Transition Smoothness 0.575
Transition Uniformity 0.716
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.014
Mean Saturation 0.178
Saturation Variance 0.012
Low Saturation Ratio 0.908
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.091
High Saturation Ratio 0.001
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.039
Complementary Balance 0.203
Analogous Dominance 0.498
Temperature Bias 0.005

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). Ab Octaves - Reflexions 31 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0805.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Ab Octaves - Reflexions 31 - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/ab-octaves-reflexions-31_8xa.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

c6fbf4d5c80b02122a1d9d104d4dd32d336a15e5eb6ffaf4e85dd17d1ad1e022