AQC0842

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0842

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0842

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork G# Diminished [1] - Research on Harmony (AQC0842) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2434x3245 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 D5DBAE 15.8 yellow-green palegoldenrod
2 BBC0CE 15.8 blue-violet silver
3 9B9C96 14.2 gray steel gray
4 C9CDD8 14.1 blue-violet lightgray
5 C7D097 13.8 yellow-green tan
6 B1B1A6 11.7 yellow steel gray
7 838584 6.7 gray gray
8 9BA8CF 5.0 blue-violet lightsteelblue
9 2C2E29 1.6 gray very dark gray
10 B37A19 1.4 yellow-orange darkgoldenrod
11 7182C1 0.3 violet dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-violet 34.9
yellow-green 29.5
gray 22.5
yellow 11.7
yellow-orange 1.4
violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
7182C1 violet dusty mauve 36.4

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.121
Mean Local Roughness 0.014
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.049
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.126
Gradient Variance 0.036
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.019
Pattern Complexity 0.11
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.615
Spatial Variation 0.08
Texture Consistency 0.584

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.719
Brightness Variance 0.121
Brightness Uniformity 0.831
Brightness Skewness -1.795
Brightness Entropy 6.594
Rms Contrast 0.121
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.316
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.333
Shadow Percentage 1.538
Midtone Percentage 26.539
Highlight Percentage 71.923
Shadow Clipping 0.006
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.008
Medium Contrast 0.02
Coarse Contrast 0.034
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.223
Edge Contrast 0.126
Contrast Clustering 0.416

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.737
Color Clustering 0.335
Color Transition Smoothness 0.685
Transition Uniformity 0.756
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.024
Mean Saturation 0.144
Saturation Variance 0.017
Low Saturation Ratio 0.913
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.073
High Saturation Ratio 0.014
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.671
Complementary Balance 0.028
Analogous Dominance 0.832
Temperature Bias -0.084

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). G# Diminished - Research on Harmony — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0842.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/g-diminished-research-on-harmony_9bo.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

5248c0da74e363d07f6add14214529a8031b0820fab83bd0e36b26dec1a5a4a7