AQC0860

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0860

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0860

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork F# Octaves [1] - Reflexions 36 (AQC0860) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2282x3042 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 DAD4C6 30.8 yellow-orange lightgray
2 94CCCF 15.0 blue-green skyblue
3 82BEC1 11.0 blue-green mediumaquamarine
4 7E9E9C 9.8 green lightslategray
5 B1D7DA 7.7 blue-green lightblue
6 4F9E97 7.5 green cadetblue
7 3A8B82 6.7 green mediumseagreen
8 5F8668 4.2 yellow-green dimgray
9 253639 3.8 blue-green darkslategray
10 AEBBA3 3.5 yellow-green steel gray
11 BE9381 0.3 orange rosybrown [Accent]
12 D19B8B 0.3 red-orange rosybrown [Accent]
13 45555E 0.3 blue darkslategray [Accent]
14 485561 0.3 blue-violet grayish purple [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-green 37.5
yellow-orange 30.8
green 23.9
yellow-green 7.7
orange 0.3
red-orange 0.3
blue 0.3
blue-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
BE9381 orange rosybrown 21.3
D19B8B red-orange rosybrown 24.1
45555E blue darkslategray 8.1
485561 blue-violet grayish purple 9.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.164
Mean Local Roughness 0.011
Roughness Uniformity 0.015
Edge Density 0.035
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.097
Gradient Variance 0.027
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.046
Pattern Complexity 0.114
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.599
Spatial Variation 0.1
Texture Consistency 0.493

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.683
Brightness Variance 0.164
Brightness Uniformity 0.76
Brightness Skewness -1.167
Brightness Entropy 6.927
Rms Contrast 0.164
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.447
Mean Local Contrast 0.012
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.451
Shadow Percentage 3.877
Midtone Percentage 31.737
Highlight Percentage 64.386
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.006
Medium Contrast 0.015
Coarse Contrast 0.027
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.222
Edge Contrast 0.097
Contrast Clustering 0.507

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.722
Color Clustering 0.753
Color Transition Smoothness 0.753
Transition Uniformity 0.816
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.054
Mean Saturation 0.253
Saturation Variance 0.025
Low Saturation Ratio 0.658
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.338
High Saturation Ratio 0.004
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.947
Complementary Balance 0.01
Analogous Dominance 0.961
Temperature Bias -0.978

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). F# Octaves - Reflexions 36 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0860.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/f-octaves-reflexions-36_9io.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

6e11bdbf5d8ea5f8714ef240c0f1527f18fb5122b2c8d4d23191bc45eec27b5d