AQC0918

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0918

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0918

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork Bb Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 8 (AQC0918) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2025-12-11. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2008x2008 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 BC85BB 17.2 red-violet steel gray
2 D1A8CE 15.0 red-violet plum
3 EDA760 13.8 orange sandybrown
4 B98171 11.8 red-orange rosybrown
5 A16AA2 11.6 red-violet dusty mauve
6 CD9788 10.5 red-orange tan
7 F08825 7.4 orange goldenrod
8 F2D5CF 6.1 red-orange bisque
9 4F403B 4.7 orange darkslategray
10 2C0D0F 1.9 red-orange very dark red
11 FEF9EA 0.3 yellow white [Accent]
12 FDC983 0.3 yellow-orange khaki [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-violet 43.9
red-orange 30.2
orange 25.9
yellow 0.3
yellow-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
FEF9EA yellow white 8.1
FDC983 yellow-orange khaki 43.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.147
Mean Local Roughness 0.036
Roughness Uniformity 0.032
Edge Density 0.193
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.273
Gradient Variance 0.112
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.001
Pattern Complexity 0.116
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.659
Spatial Variation 0.079
Texture Consistency 0.746

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.619
Brightness Variance 0.147
Brightness Uniformity 0.763
Brightness Skewness -1.226
Brightness Entropy 6.959
Rms Contrast 0.147
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.372
Mean Local Contrast 0.039
Contrast Uniformity 0.16
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.557
Shadow Percentage 6.299
Midtone Percentage 56.405
Highlight Percentage 37.296
Shadow Clipping 0.001
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.019
Medium Contrast 0.048
Coarse Contrast 0.062
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.308
Edge Contrast 0.273
Contrast Clustering 0.254

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.712
Color Clustering 0.344
Color Transition Smoothness 0.322
Transition Uniformity 0.267
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.001
Mean Saturation 0.387
Saturation Variance 0.039
Low Saturation Ratio 0.352
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.559
High Saturation Ratio 0.089
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.774
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.653
Temperature Bias 0.797

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). Bb Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 8 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0918.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/bb-major-research-on-harmony-variations-8_igh.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

4907e8195f606311bfbb198a5470afedb972dd3109ef440be45b78833a8962f2