AQC0864

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0864

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0864

The artwork G Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 (AQC0864) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2025-12-09. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2245x2993 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-09.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E26308 21.2 orange chocolate
2 EB923B 20.1 orange peru
3 E88529 13.4 orange goldenrod
4 B76344 12.4 orange indianred
5 F09D4F 10.4 orange sandybrown
6 C77553 8.8 orange coral
7 A64F31 6.0 orange burnt sienna
8 4F311F 3.1 orange dark brown
9 795454 3.1 red-orange dimgray
10 F1C78C 1.4 yellow-orange burlywood
11 766081 0.3 red-violet dusty mauve [Accent]
12 725B7F 0.3 violet dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 95.5
red-orange 3.1
yellow-orange 1.4
red-violet 0.3
violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
766081 red-violet dusty mauve 21.9
725B7F violet dusty mauve 23.3

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.111
Mean Local Roughness 0.01
Roughness Uniformity 0.011
Edge Density 0.033
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.096
Gradient Variance 0.015
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.021
Pattern Complexity 0.112
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.599
Spatial Variation 0.057
Texture Consistency 0.699

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.547
Brightness Variance 0.111
Brightness Uniformity 0.797
Brightness Skewness -0.683
Brightness Entropy 6.646
Rms Contrast 0.111
Michelson Contrast 0.93
Weber Contrast 0.371
Mean Local Contrast 0.012
Contrast Uniformity 0.052
Dynamic Range 0.941
Effective Dynamic Range 0.325
Shadow Percentage 3.99
Midtone Percentage 85.325
Highlight Percentage 10.685
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.005
Medium Contrast 0.015
Coarse Contrast 0.025
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.211
Edge Contrast 0.096
Contrast Clustering 0.301

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.755
Color Clustering 0.373
Color Transition Smoothness 0.754
Transition Uniformity 0.898
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.029
Mean Saturation 0.74
Saturation Variance 0.026
Low Saturation Ratio 0.015
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.371
High Saturation Ratio 0.614
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.988
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.996
Temperature Bias 0.998

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). G Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0864.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/g-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-10_9k8.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

adf7b8fca3cf21b565184877a469652dcdb94d318c018dee1bf6fae4e7e528a3