AQC0876

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0876

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0876

Analysis record [3]: E Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 5 (AQC0876) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2025-12-11.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1968x2952 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 EE7F0D 18.0 orange darkorange
2 E49C40 15.8 orange peru
3 ECD741 15.7 yellow sandybrown
4 EEAC56 11.3 orange lightsalmon
5 D1CF1A 10.1 yellow goldenrod
6 BAC158 9.8 yellow ochre
7 CE9723 6.5 yellow-orange darkgoldenrod
8 605646 6.1 yellow-orange dark brown
9 E1DDCE 3.5 yellow gainsboro
10 413219 3.4 yellow-orange darkslategray
11 C5D57F 0.3 yellow-green ochre [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 45.0
yellow 39.1
yellow-orange 16.0
yellow-green 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
C5D57F yellow-green ochre 45.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.146
Mean Local Roughness 0.019
Roughness Uniformity 0.022
Edge Density 0.063
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.153
Gradient Variance 0.055
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.012
Pattern Complexity 0.107
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.627
Spatial Variation 0.071
Texture Consistency 0.688

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.656
Brightness Variance 0.146
Brightness Uniformity 0.777
Brightness Skewness -1.388
Brightness Entropy 6.865
Rms Contrast 0.146
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.345
Mean Local Contrast 0.021
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.522
Shadow Percentage 6.21
Midtone Percentage 37.949
Highlight Percentage 55.841
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.01
Medium Contrast 0.026
Coarse Contrast 0.039
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.249
Edge Contrast 0.153
Contrast Clustering 0.312

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.777
Color Clustering 0.393
Color Transition Smoothness 0.617
Transition Uniformity 0.622
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.008
Mean Saturation 0.704
Saturation Variance 0.048
Low Saturation Ratio 0.089
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.311
High Saturation Ratio 0.6
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.975
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.999
Temperature Bias 0.851

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). E Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 5 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0876.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/e-minor-research-on-harmony-variations-5_i1o.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

f2455d3abc45e4c7d241f458a9dc81b38a836cc322f8a1f8a177482404469c0d