AQC0704

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0704

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0704

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork F Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 9 (AQC0704) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1821x1821 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 7E5D6B 18.4 red dusty mauve
2 DF776F 16.2 red-orange lightcoral
3 302821 13.6 orange very dark gray
4 4A4045 11.6 red dusty mauve
5 EA7159 11.5 red-orange coral
6 A33C27 8.2 red-orange brown
7 E3CA9F 8.2 yellow-orange burlywood
8 525363 6.9 violet dusty mauve
9 647687 4.3 blue grayish purple
10 AF8F8A 1.2 red-orange rosybrown
11 DFD9CA 0.3 yellow lightgray [Accent]
12 6284B2 0.3 blue-violet grayish purple [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-orange 37.1
red 29.9
orange 13.6
yellow-orange 8.2
violet 6.9
blue 4.3
yellow 0.3
blue-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
DFD9CA yellow lightgray 8.1
6284B2 blue-violet grayish purple 28.0

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.181
Mean Local Roughness 0.007
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.009
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.049
Gradient Variance 0.027
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.217
Pattern Complexity 0.099
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.612
Spatial Variation 0.123
Texture Consistency 0.417

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.434
Brightness Variance 0.181
Brightness Uniformity 0.583
Brightness Skewness 0.326
Brightness Entropy 6.834
Rms Contrast 0.181
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.715
Mean Local Contrast 0.007
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.639
Shadow Percentage 29.601
Midtone Percentage 61.742
Highlight Percentage 8.656
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.004
Medium Contrast 0.009
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.049
Contrast Clustering 0.583

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.793
Color Clustering 0.571
Color Transition Smoothness 0.861
Transition Uniformity 0.818
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.242
Mean Saturation 0.375
Saturation Variance 0.037
Low Saturation Ratio 0.463
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.462
High Saturation Ratio 0.076
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.788
Complementary Balance 0.065
Analogous Dominance 0.914
Temperature Bias 0.843

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). F Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 9 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0704.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/f-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-9_7u0.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

c504605e8aff3b62800989f1d22c94ad9a7530d17358bfcb1b17b7bc70219a47