AQC0859

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0859

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0859

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork F Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 9 (AQC0859) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2291x3054 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 EB9780 21.9 red-orange darksalmon
2 F1A894 18.3 red-orange burlywood
3 E5875E 14.1 orange salmon
4 D8764B 11.7 orange peru
5 66377C 9.0 red-violet darkslateblue
6 4A2163 8.4 red-violet indigo
7 CD878A 6.2 red-orange rosybrown
8 875393 5.2 red-violet gray
9 4F312A 3.5 red-orange darkslategray
10 935D57 1.7 red-orange burnt sienna
11 2B074C 0.3 violet very dark purple [Accent]
12 9F6A7E 0.3 red dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-orange 51.6
orange 25.8
red-violet 22.5
violet 0.3
red 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
2B074C violet very dark purple 46.7
9F6A7E red dusty mauve 24.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.179
Mean Local Roughness 0.013
Roughness Uniformity 0.012
Edge Density 0.038
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.116
Gradient Variance 0.021
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.018
Pattern Complexity 0.119
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.596
Spatial Variation 0.13
Texture Consistency 0.632

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.558
Brightness Variance 0.179
Brightness Uniformity 0.679
Brightness Skewness -0.899
Brightness Entropy 6.997
Rms Contrast 0.179
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.661
Mean Local Contrast 0.014
Contrast Uniformity 0.115
Dynamic Range 0.976
Effective Dynamic Range 0.541
Shadow Percentage 18.821
Midtone Percentage 44.002
Highlight Percentage 37.177
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.006
Medium Contrast 0.018
Coarse Contrast 0.031
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.209
Edge Contrast 0.116
Contrast Clustering 0.368

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.735
Color Clustering 0.561
Color Transition Smoothness 0.701
Transition Uniformity 0.858
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.026
Mean Saturation 0.503
Saturation Variance 0.014
Low Saturation Ratio 0.026
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.943
High Saturation Ratio 0.031
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.8
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.778
Temperature Bias 0.783

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). F Major - Research on Harmony - Variation 9 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0859.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/f-major-research-on-harmony-variation-9_9ia.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

5299e5bd6c9445ddf6d32da58c0fb8db9c66b206b4826d5658083db8f5942c3f