AQC0884

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0884

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0884

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork G Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 10 (AQC0884) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2025-12-11.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1939x2909 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E5C798 17.0 yellow-orange burlywood
2 E5AC60 15.1 orange sandybrown
3 EDB86F 12.9 yellow-orange lightsalmon
4 EE8523 11.9 orange goldenrod
5 625B4F 11.6 yellow-orange dimgray
6 C7AF35 10.3 yellow-orange peru
7 E3E0D4 8.8 yellow gainsboro
8 C3CD5F 8.0 yellow ochre
9 403525 2.4 yellow-orange darkslategray
10 AD9E85 1.9 yellow-orange rosybrown

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 56.1
orange 27.0
yellow 16.8

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.161
Mean Local Roughness 0.013
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.022
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.12
Gradient Variance 0.042
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.008
Pattern Complexity 0.109
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.599
Spatial Variation 0.102
Texture Consistency 0.653

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.676
Brightness Variance 0.161
Brightness Uniformity 0.763
Brightness Skewness -1.241
Brightness Entropy 6.937
Rms Contrast 0.161
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.557
Mean Local Contrast 0.015
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.545
Shadow Percentage 5.339
Midtone Percentage 27.192
Highlight Percentage 67.469
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.007
Medium Contrast 0.019
Coarse Contrast 0.035
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.196
Edge Contrast 0.12
Contrast Clustering 0.347

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.771
Color Clustering 0.455
Color Transition Smoothness 0.694
Transition Uniformity 0.716
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.014
Mean Saturation 0.476
Saturation Variance 0.058
Low Saturation Ratio 0.237
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.553
High Saturation Ratio 0.21
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.981
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 1.0
Temperature Bias 0.886

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). G Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 10 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0884.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/g-major-research-on-harmony-variations-10_i4k.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

b9ac77062e72d84c37945a97965fa0d097016c897b24dfb254e036d41b3d2f03