AQC0889

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0889

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0889

Analysis record [3]: Bb Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 9 (AQC0889) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2025-12-11.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1952x2928 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 67E2D6 17.4 green mediumturquoise
2 DEC4DF 14.1 red-violet thistle
3 C79B8C 12.6 orange rosybrown
4 A278B1 12.3 red-violet dusty mauve
5 3A99DD 11.5 blue-violet dodgerblue
6 5E5753 9.0 gray dimgray
7 896294 8.6 red-violet dusty mauve
8 BC97C9 7.3 red-violet plum
9 EBEBE6 5.1 white white
10 1E1922 1.9 red-violet very dark gray
11 90A89B 0.3 yellow-green darkseagreen [Accent]
12 43C5F7 0.3 blue mediumturquoise [Accent]
13 507F80 0.3 blue-green blue gray [Accent]
14 7588C8 0.3 violet dusty mauve [Accent]
15 E6B2A2 0.3 red-orange burlywood [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-violet 44.3
green 17.4
orange 12.6
blue-violet 11.5
gray 9.0
white 5.1
yellow-green 0.3
blue 0.3
blue-green 0.3
violet 0.3
red-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
90A89B yellow-green darkseagreen 11.7
43C5F7 blue mediumturquoise 39.8
507F80 blue-green blue gray 16.2
7588C8 violet dusty mauve 36.4
E6B2A2 red-orange burlywood 22.7

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.176
Mean Local Roughness 0.035
Roughness Uniformity 0.036
Edge Density 0.171
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.273
Gradient Variance 0.131
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.024
Pattern Complexity 0.122
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.66
Spatial Variation 0.101
Texture Consistency 0.751

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.622
Brightness Variance 0.176
Brightness Uniformity 0.718
Brightness Skewness -0.498
Brightness Entropy 7.403
Rms Contrast 0.176
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.531
Mean Local Contrast 0.038
Contrast Uniformity 0.002
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.541
Shadow Percentage 4.988
Midtone Percentage 50.144
Highlight Percentage 44.869
Shadow Clipping 0.008
Highlight Clipping 0.005
Tonal Balance 0.118
Fine Contrast 0.02
Medium Contrast 0.046
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.273
Contrast Clustering 0.249

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.696
Color Clustering 0.578
Color Transition Smoothness 0.318
Transition Uniformity 0.159
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.028
Mean Saturation 0.356
Saturation Variance 0.044
Low Saturation Ratio 0.435
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.467
High Saturation Ratio 0.098
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.384
Complementary Balance 0.026
Analogous Dominance 0.417
Temperature Bias -0.185

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). Bb Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 9 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0889.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/bb-minor-research-on-harmony-variations-9_i6d.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

c1fadd11eaf97b81f08a27149fc1da52fe0759512b03af57781308e7e9cb7054