AQC0898

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0898

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0898

The artwork B Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 9 (AQC0898) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2025-12-11. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2084x3126 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 655935 15.7 yellow-orange dark brown
2 99ACC7 13.6 blue-violet steel gray
3 7D93B7 13.1 blue-violet lightslategray
4 CB86A3 12.5 red rosybrown
5 97BE42 11.5 yellow-green yellowgreen
6 D5B48D 9.2 yellow-orange tan
7 F0CAAD 8.6 orange wheat
8 836667 8.3 red-orange dimgray
9 D6D457 4.6 yellow ochre
10 312312 3.1 yellow-orange very dark gray
11 995797 0.3 red-violet gray [Accent]
12 3A3747 0.3 violet dusty mauve [Accent]
13 76938A 0.3 green lightslategray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-orange 27.9
blue-violet 26.7
red 12.5
yellow-green 11.5
orange 8.6
red-orange 8.3
yellow 4.6
red-violet 0.3
violet 0.3
green 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
995797 red-violet gray 44.1
3A3747 violet dusty mauve 11.2
76938A green lightslategray 12.0

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.171
Mean Local Roughness 0.026
Roughness Uniformity 0.026
Edge Density 0.111
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.213
Gradient Variance 0.082
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.024
Pattern Complexity 0.125
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.63
Spatial Variation 0.092
Texture Consistency 0.738

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.586
Brightness Variance 0.171
Brightness Uniformity 0.709
Brightness Skewness -0.673
Brightness Entropy 7.299
Rms Contrast 0.171
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.568
Mean Local Contrast 0.029
Contrast Uniformity 0.032
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.533
Shadow Percentage 9.342
Midtone Percentage 55.815
Highlight Percentage 34.843
Shadow Clipping 0.003
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.014
Medium Contrast 0.035
Coarse Contrast 0.054
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.261
Edge Contrast 0.213
Contrast Clustering 0.262

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.722
Color Clustering 0.576
Color Transition Smoothness 0.458
Transition Uniformity 0.446
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.025
Mean Saturation 0.401
Saturation Variance 0.025
Low Saturation Ratio 0.255
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.699
High Saturation Ratio 0.046
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.361
Complementary Balance 0.167
Analogous Dominance 0.518
Temperature Bias 0.347

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). B Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 9 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0898.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/b-major-research-on-harmony-variations-9_i9m.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

80094e1fbae717e20353505a32af0c20df935ff8283f9acd8e37b8ade4c03851