AQC0903

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0903

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0903

Analysis record [3]: D Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 10 (AQC0903) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2025-12-11.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2096x2096 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 EE832E 25.2 orange peru
2 E2A765 17.4 orange sandybrown
3 D09A47 11.7 yellow-orange goldenrod
4 C08D80 10.7 red-orange rosybrown
5 EEB779 10.0 orange burlywood
6 55473B 7.1 orange dark brown
7 AB7B6E 7.0 red-orange gray
8 D5A294 6.5 red-orange tan
9 DDD7CC 3.7 yellow-orange lightgray
10 351A0E 0.7 orange very dark orange
11 F9F8E8 0.3 yellow white [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 60.4
red-orange 24.3
yellow-orange 15.4
yellow 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
F9F8E8 yellow white 8.2

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.126
Mean Local Roughness 0.024
Roughness Uniformity 0.022
Edge Density 0.116
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.187
Gradient Variance 0.051
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.007
Pattern Complexity 0.111
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.669
Spatial Variation 0.071
Texture Consistency 0.5

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.624
Brightness Variance 0.126
Brightness Uniformity 0.797
Brightness Skewness -1.344
Brightness Entropy 6.552
Rms Contrast 0.126
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.304
Mean Local Contrast 0.027
Contrast Uniformity 0.135
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.486
Shadow Percentage 7.432
Midtone Percentage 55.669
Highlight Percentage 36.899
Shadow Clipping 0.001
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.013
Medium Contrast 0.033
Coarse Contrast 0.04
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.314
Edge Contrast 0.187
Contrast Clustering 0.5

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.817
Color Clustering 0.519
Color Transition Smoothness 0.542
Transition Uniformity 0.674
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.012
Mean Saturation 0.534
Saturation Variance 0.045
Low Saturation Ratio 0.134
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.593
High Saturation Ratio 0.273
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.989
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 1.0
Temperature Bias 1.0

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). D Minor - Research on Harmony - Variations 10 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0903.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/d-minor-research-on-harmony-variations-10_ibf.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

29af0efdeab3f89275c67e312fc0dbced06e6938a24d6a4365466b98090233c9