AQC0950

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0950

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0950

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork Untitled Artwork (AQC0950) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-03-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1943x2915 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-03-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 DF9265 21.8 orange darksalmon
2 DCBB88 13.3 yellow-orange burlywood
3 9F9D9B 11.4 gray steel gray
4 EDA17B 11.1 orange lightsalmon
5 8B8988 10.1 gray gray
6 E2770D 9.6 orange chocolate
7 EECD9D 8.9 yellow-orange wheat
8 1D1916 6.9 gray black
9 E0D8C4 6.0 yellow lightgray
10 5A4538 1.0 orange dark brown
11 A86755 0.3 red-orange indianred [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 43.4
gray 28.4
yellow-orange 22.2
yellow 6.0
red-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
A86755 red-orange indianred 31.9

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.179
Mean Local Roughness 0.022
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.095
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.176
Gradient Variance 0.045
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.004
Pattern Complexity 0.116
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.636
Spatial Variation 0.129
Texture Consistency 0.589

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.631
Brightness Variance 0.179
Brightness Uniformity 0.717
Brightness Skewness -1.62
Brightness Entropy 6.939
Rms Contrast 0.179
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.375
Mean Local Contrast 0.025
Contrast Uniformity 0.175
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.741
Shadow Percentage 7.645
Midtone Percentage 47.605
Highlight Percentage 44.75
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.011
Medium Contrast 0.03
Coarse Contrast 0.04
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.273
Edge Contrast 0.176
Contrast Clustering 0.411

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.776
Color Clustering 0.577
Color Transition Smoothness 0.564
Transition Uniformity 0.695
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.006
Mean Saturation 0.378
Saturation Variance 0.072
Low Saturation Ratio 0.336
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.565
High Saturation Ratio 0.098
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.987
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.999
Temperature Bias 0.999

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2026). D5 (Power Chord) - Research on Harmony — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0950.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2026). B Minor 7 - Research on Harmony - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2026/03/d5-power-chord-research-on-harmony_1yg5.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

a9e0473d7931a490ba6bfa570e1b71a9c790e6058fb9f49a3221cb37885a0bbb