AQC0951

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0951

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0951

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork F Major [1] 9 - Research on Harmony (AQC0951) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-03-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 1846x2769 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-03-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E8A573 17.4 orange darksalmon
2 BABCBD 15.9 gray silver
3 E9B2A8 14.5 red-orange lightpink
4 ACAAA7 13.8 gray steel gray
5 DC2E15 11.9 red-orange firebrick
6 D07423 8.3 orange chocolate
7 E6DDD2 8.0 yellow-orange gainsboro
8 42364C 4.8 violet dusty mauve
9 311D1F 2.8 red-orange very dark gray
10 BA2034 2.6 red-orange brown
11 8C69A1 0.3 red-violet dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-orange 31.8
gray 29.7
orange 25.7
yellow-orange 8.0
violet 4.8
red-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
8C69A1 red-violet dusty mauve 35.4

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.194
Mean Local Roughness 0.031
Roughness Uniformity 0.027
Edge Density 0.129
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.219
Gradient Variance 0.071
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.014
Pattern Complexity 0.119
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.662
Spatial Variation 0.107
Texture Consistency 0.598

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.624
Brightness Variance 0.194
Brightness Uniformity 0.689
Brightness Skewness -0.935
Brightness Entropy 7.171
Rms Contrast 0.194
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.585
Mean Local Contrast 0.031
Contrast Uniformity 0.115
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.635
Shadow Percentage 9.856
Midtone Percentage 28.761
Highlight Percentage 61.383
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.086
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.018
Medium Contrast 0.038
Coarse Contrast 0.047
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.392
Edge Contrast 0.219
Contrast Clustering 0.402

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.742
Color Clustering 0.486
Color Transition Smoothness 0.467
Transition Uniformity 0.544
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.014
Mean Saturation 0.377
Saturation Variance 0.105
Low Saturation Ratio 0.511
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.261
High Saturation Ratio 0.227
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.878
Complementary Balance 0.001
Analogous Dominance 0.925
Temperature Bias 0.927

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2026). F Major 9 - Research on Harmony — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0951.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2026). F Major 9 - Research on Harmony - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2026/03/f-major-9-research-on-harmony_1ygn.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/10/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

2f6521cf2445310fd8bddd65f4b7121a157a1bdaca2e615d51b94b73c9b4cf40