AQC0866

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0866

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0866

The artwork G Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 8 (AQC0866) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2025-12-09. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2264x3019 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-09.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 EC9930 22.0 orange goldenrod
2 8E6FCC 16.1 violet mediumpurple
3 E47F1A 14.8 orange chocolate
4 7959B8 11.5 violet slateblue
5 A585E0 10.3 violet mediumslateblue
6 F2AF4E 8.5 yellow-orange sandybrown
7 562866 6.2 red-violet darkslateblue
8 6B3C8F 5.2 violet dimgray
9 472C28 3.4 red-orange darkslategray
10 886059 2.1 red-orange dimgrey
11 A57E8C 0.3 red dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
violet 43.0
orange 36.9
yellow-orange 8.5
red-violet 6.2
red-orange 5.5
red 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
A57E8C red dusty mauve 17.1

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.145
Mean Local Roughness 0.025
Roughness Uniformity 0.014
Edge Density 0.167
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.201
Gradient Variance 0.029
Gradient Smoothness 0.159
Directional Coherence 0.005
Pattern Complexity 0.121
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.631
Spatial Variation 0.103
Texture Consistency 0.709

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.533
Brightness Variance 0.145
Brightness Uniformity 0.728
Brightness Skewness -0.807
Brightness Entropy 7.089
Rms Contrast 0.145
Michelson Contrast 0.969
Weber Contrast 0.568
Mean Local Contrast 0.026
Contrast Uniformity 0.458
Dynamic Range 0.98
Effective Dynamic Range 0.482
Shadow Percentage 12.371
Midtone Percentage 71.029
Highlight Percentage 16.599
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.015
Medium Contrast 0.032
Coarse Contrast 0.046
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.317
Edge Contrast 0.201
Contrast Clustering 0.291

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.717
Color Clustering 0.31
Color Transition Smoothness 0.49
Transition Uniformity 0.806
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.001
Mean Saturation 0.63
Saturation Variance 0.034
Low Saturation Ratio 0.022
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.558
High Saturation Ratio 0.42
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.46
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 0.506
Temperature Bias 0.517

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). G Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 8 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0866.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/01/g-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-8_9l0.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

0df4647b60714e35449a7757dc55870888ba71a74b23b1e069f41b449d48924a