AQC0462

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0462

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0462

Computational image analysis [3] of artwork Hawaï [1] (AQC0462) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] using k-means clustering method with 10 color extraction parameters. Analysis includes color distribution, texture metrics, brightness/contrast measurements, and spatial pattern characterization. Analysis completed on 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 3024x4032 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 B7998E 13.8 orange rosybrown
2 946669 12.4 red-orange gray
3 74A4E9 10.6 blue-violet cornflowerblue
4 707995 10.4 blue-violet grayish purple
5 998CB6 10.2 violet steel gray
6 535164 10.1 violet dusty mauve
7 B6B6DF 9.9 violet lightsteelblue
8 212E49 9.8 blue-violet very dark indigo
9 487DDA 8.2 blue-violet royalblue
10 1C53AE 4.6 violet darkslateblue
11 65D3E6 0.3 blue-green skyblue [Accent]
12 C2E1FB 0.3 blue paleturquoise [Accent]
13 D5AEBD 0.3 red silver [Accent]
14 B8AE6A 0.3 yellow ochre [Accent]
15 7D3962 0.3 red-violet dusty mauve [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
blue-violet 39.0
violet 34.8
orange 13.8
red-orange 12.4
blue-green 0.3
blue 0.3
red 0.3
yellow 0.3
red-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
65D3E6 blue-green skyblue 32.2
C2E1FB blue paleturquoise 16.8
D5AEBD red silver 17.1
B8AE6A yellow ochre 36.5
7D3962 red-violet dusty mauve 36.7

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.168
Mean Local Roughness 0.036
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.254
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.26
Gradient Variance 0.042
Gradient Smoothness 0.216
Directional Coherence 0.003
Pattern Complexity 0.124
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.662
Spatial Variation 0.085
Texture Consistency 0.792

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.495
Brightness Variance 0.168
Brightness Uniformity 0.662
Brightness Skewness -0.411
Brightness Entropy 7.373
Rms Contrast 0.168
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.652
Mean Local Contrast 0.035
Contrast Uniformity 0.527
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.565
Shadow Percentage 18.086
Midtone Percentage 66.047
Highlight Percentage 15.867
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.144
Fine Contrast 0.022
Medium Contrast 0.044
Coarse Contrast 0.056
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.403
Edge Contrast 0.26
Contrast Clustering 0.208

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.649
Color Clustering 0.541
Color Transition Smoothness 0.33
Transition Uniformity 0.722
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.002
Mean Saturation 0.391
Saturation Variance 0.041
Low Saturation Ratio 0.415
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.498
High Saturation Ratio 0.087
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.529
Complementary Balance 0.11
Analogous Dominance 0.674
Temperature Bias -0.295

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2023). Hawaï — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0462.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2023/01/hawai_57w.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

77d3bafb2f1c2e6c54b56fe62a1c11ec21fb7ff2d342db050ddafd7c3cfc34c6