AQC0596

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0596

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0596

The artwork F minor - Research [1] on Harmony - Variation 2 (AQC0596) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] underwent comprehensive computational analysis [3] on 2026-02-04. Method: k-means clustering with 10 colors extracted. Metrics documented: color distribution, texture analysis, brightness/contrast, spatial patterns.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2560x3413 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 D8D6D0 32.4 white lightgray
2 E4E2D9 29.6 yellow gainsboro
3 24384F 11.8 blue-violet grayish purple
4 C8CACB 10.2 white lightgrey
5 23141A 6.5 red black
6 475970 3.1 blue-violet grayish purple
7 469ED3 2.2 blue cornflowerblue
8 AA5E28 2.0 orange burnt sienna
9 CB8856 1.2 orange peru
10 7E8DA1 1.1 blue-violet grayish purple
11 69524C 0.3 red-orange dimgray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
white 42.6
yellow 29.6
blue-violet 15.9
red 6.5
orange 3.1
blue 2.2
red-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
69524C red-orange dimgray 11.4

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.277
Mean Local Roughness 0.02
Roughness Uniformity 0.033
Edge Density 0.068
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.144
Gradient Variance 0.085
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.134
Pattern Complexity 0.12
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.667
Spatial Variation 0.22
Texture Consistency 0.238

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.691
Brightness Variance 0.277
Brightness Uniformity 0.599
Brightness Skewness -1.2
Brightness Entropy 6.509
Rms Contrast 0.277
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.789
Mean Local Contrast 0.02
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.776
Shadow Percentage 19.797
Midtone Percentage 7.725
Highlight Percentage 72.479
Shadow Clipping 0.01
Highlight Clipping 0.085
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.012
Medium Contrast 0.026
Coarse Contrast None
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 1.0
Edge Contrast 0.144
Contrast Clustering 0.762

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.797
Color Clustering 0.789
Color Transition Smoothness 0.626
Transition Uniformity 0.417
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.148
Mean Saturation 0.182
Saturation Variance 0.052
Low Saturation Ratio 0.744
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.23
High Saturation Ratio 0.026
Saturation Clustering 0.998
Hue Concentration 0.469
Complementary Balance 0.117
Analogous Dominance 0.664
Temperature Bias -0.325

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). F minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 2 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0596.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/f-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-2_6o0.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

43b66f14f3ea54a6511b97e26c4dfcef70fa45bbd8472678d965bfb303009cb1