AQC0747

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0747

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0747

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork C Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 5 (AQC0747) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 3024x4032 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 904519 17.0 orange russet
2 C0B6A9 16.1 yellow-orange silver
3 E1502E 13.2 red-orange chocolate
4 262630 12.8 violet very dark gray
5 AE5A25 12.1 orange burnt sienna
6 714141 11.0 red-orange russet
7 89525F 7.7 red dimgray
8 E2C3C4 5.4 red-orange thistle
9 ED9127 2.5 orange goldenrod
10 F0CD7B 2.2 yellow-orange burlywood
11 E3E7F1 0.3 blue-violet white [Accent]
12 CCAFC1 0.3 red-violet silver [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 31.6
red-orange 29.6
yellow-orange 18.3
violet 12.8
red 7.7
blue-violet 0.3
red-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
E3E7F1 blue-violet white 5.1
CCAFC1 red-violet silver 14.9

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.199
Mean Local Roughness 0.012
Roughness Uniformity 0.013
Edge Density 0.038
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.119
Gradient Variance 0.029
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.017
Pattern Complexity 0.113
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.59
Spatial Variation 0.151
Texture Consistency 0.42

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.45
Brightness Variance 0.199
Brightness Uniformity 0.559
Brightness Skewness 0.383
Brightness Entropy 7.256
Rms Contrast 0.199
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.745
Mean Local Contrast 0.015
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.647
Shadow Percentage 27.071
Midtone Percentage 49.699
Highlight Percentage 23.23
Shadow Clipping 0.003
Highlight Clipping 0.004
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.006
Medium Contrast 0.019
Coarse Contrast 0.033
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.178
Edge Contrast 0.119
Contrast Clustering 0.58

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.773
Color Clustering 0.424
Color Transition Smoothness 0.689
Transition Uniformity 0.8
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.029
Mean Saturation 0.52
Saturation Variance 0.084
Low Saturation Ratio 0.298
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.288
High Saturation Ratio 0.414
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.759
Complementary Balance 0.03
Analogous Dominance 0.877
Temperature Bias 0.774

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). C Major - Research on Harmony - Variation 5 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0747.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/c-major-research-on-harmony-variation-5_8aq.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

9699d1c97972661229e17f9013be87f69f82e7bbc55be788e410b1104916a0dc