AQC0775

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0775

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0775

Analysis record [3]: C Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 8 (AQC0775) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2]. Method: k-means. Parameters: 10 colors. Metrics: color distribution, texture, brightness, spatial patterns. Completed: 2026-02-04.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2186x3280 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 C6AFA4 16.0 orange tan
2 B0A296 13.9 orange steel gray
3 9B9183 12.2 yellow-orange gray
4 A13C27 12.0 red-orange brown
5 C04B27 10.7 red-orange burnt sienna
6 1F191C 9.7 gray very dark gray
7 8B4B49 9.0 red-orange burnt sienna
8 DBB5C0 7.2 red thistle
9 39363A 6.5 gray dusty mauve
10 DB7214 2.9 orange chocolate
11 756934 0.3 yellow dark brown [Accent]
12 E6DBE4 0.3 red-violet gainsboro [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 32.7
red-orange 31.7
gray 16.2
yellow-orange 12.2
red 7.2
yellow 0.3
red-violet 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
756934 yellow dark brown 31.1
E6DBE4 red-violet gainsboro 5.8

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.205
Mean Local Roughness 0.013
Roughness Uniformity 0.014
Edge Density 0.048
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.13
Gradient Variance 0.039
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.018
Pattern Complexity 0.109
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.578
Spatial Variation 0.122
Texture Consistency 0.63

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.488
Brightness Variance 0.205
Brightness Uniformity 0.581
Brightness Skewness -0.394
Brightness Entropy 7.329
Rms Contrast 0.205
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.774
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.643
Shadow Percentage 20.331
Midtone Percentage 53.501
Highlight Percentage 26.168
Shadow Clipping 0.005
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.051
Fine Contrast 0.006
Medium Contrast 0.02
Coarse Contrast 0.038
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.165
Edge Contrast 0.13
Contrast Clustering 0.37

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.73
Color Clustering 0.663
Color Transition Smoothness 0.656
Transition Uniformity 0.715
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.024
Mean Saturation 0.362
Saturation Variance 0.084
Low Saturation Ratio 0.606
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.15
High Saturation Ratio 0.244
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.925
Complementary Balance 0.004
Analogous Dominance 0.966
Temperature Bias 0.963

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). C Major - Research on Harmony - Variation 8 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0775.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/c-major-research-on-harmony-variation-8_8lm.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

606aa2943cf57a6988a7792ada521033fc700033a9df6fa7b01039152f95554f