AQC0779

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0779

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0779

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork D Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 (AQC0779) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2276x3414 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 343E33 15.0 yellow-green darkslategray
2 8F8A77 13.8 yellow gray
3 7DB088 13.7 yellow-green darkseagreen
4 201C19 12.0 gray very dark gray
5 B1A688 10.9 yellow-orange rosybrown
6 D0A376 10.7 orange tan
7 D3780F 9.0 orange chocolate
8 CA962F 6.6 yellow-orange peru
9 D2C4AD 4.9 yellow-orange silver
10 87622C 3.3 yellow-orange burnt sienna
11 451102 0.3 red-orange very dark red [Accent]
12 AFBEC3 0.3 blue silver [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
yellow-green 28.8
yellow-orange 25.7
orange 19.7
yellow 13.8
gray 12.0
red-orange 0.3
blue 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
451102 red-orange very dark red 31.2
AFBEC3 blue silver 5.7

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.208
Mean Local Roughness 0.01
Roughness Uniformity 0.015
Edge Density 0.021
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.103
Gradient Variance 0.046
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.035
Pattern Complexity 0.118
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.574
Spatial Variation 0.146
Texture Consistency 0.495

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.49
Brightness Variance 0.208
Brightness Uniformity 0.576
Brightness Skewness -0.721
Brightness Entropy 7.167
Rms Contrast 0.208
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.798
Mean Local Contrast 0.013
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.616
Shadow Percentage 25.959
Midtone Percentage 56.839
Highlight Percentage 17.202
Shadow Clipping 0.01
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.005
Medium Contrast 0.016
Coarse Contrast 0.033
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.152
Edge Contrast 0.103
Contrast Clustering 0.505

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.758
Color Clustering 0.66
Color Transition Smoothness 0.72
Transition Uniformity 0.674
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.046
Mean Saturation 0.362
Saturation Variance 0.076
Low Saturation Ratio 0.573
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.243
High Saturation Ratio 0.184
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.748
Complementary Balance 0.004
Analogous Dominance 0.741
Temperature Bias 0.493

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). D Major - Research on Harmony - Variation 10 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0779.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/d-major-research-on-harmony-variation-10_8n6.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

7c8cb54e8e1cc4587433be086a4cd97b94d59bd3c0d74a8ca45ec6ddb99050da