AQC0786

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0786

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0786

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork F Minor [1] - Research on Harmony - Variation 15 (AQC0786) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2026-02-04. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2435x3652 pixels. Analysis date: 2026-02-04.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 29222A 28.8 red-violet very dark gray
2 BC78A3 20.9 red-violet rosybrown
3 3E88DF 16.5 blue-violet royalblue
4 574477 9.7 violet dusty mauve
5 342B60 6.3 violet dusty mauve
6 5864A3 4.8 violet dusty mauve
7 993952 4.6 red brown
8 B54A6D 4.5 red indianred
9 DCB2C1 2.2 red thistle
10 C8442F 1.9 red-orange chocolate
11 8C7B3A 0.3 yellow-orange olivedrab [Accent]
12 5A3C2A 0.3 orange dark brown [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
red-violet 49.6
violet 20.7
blue-violet 16.5
red 11.3
red-orange 1.9
yellow-orange 0.3
orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
8C7B3A yellow-orange olivedrab 37.1
5A3C2A orange dark brown 19.4

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.178
Mean Local Roughness 0.007
Roughness Uniformity 0.009
Edge Density 0.021
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.083
Gradient Variance 0.016
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.047
Pattern Complexity 0.108
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.564
Spatial Variation 0.138
Texture Consistency 0.356

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.366
Brightness Variance 0.178
Brightness Uniformity 0.513
Brightness Skewness 0.054
Brightness Entropy 7.049
Rms Contrast 0.178
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.757
Mean Local Contrast 0.01
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.482
Shadow Percentage 43.094
Midtone Percentage 54.728
Highlight Percentage 2.178
Shadow Clipping 0.0
Highlight Clipping 0.0
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.004
Medium Contrast 0.012
Coarse Contrast 0.025
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.152
Edge Contrast 0.083
Contrast Clustering 0.644

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.788
Color Clustering 0.63
Color Transition Smoothness 0.773
Transition Uniformity 0.889
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.066
Mean Saturation 0.435
Saturation Variance 0.041
Low Saturation Ratio 0.275
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.554
High Saturation Ratio 0.171
Saturation Clustering 1.0
Hue Concentration 0.668
Complementary Balance 0.006
Analogous Dominance 0.633
Temperature Bias 0.214

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2024). F Minor - Research on Harmony - Variation 15 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0786.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2024/01/f-minor-research-on-harmony-variation-15_8pw.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

f07f059b248e619998ba120ce90ff03c2308675ad62b2245589764bf449ff9c8