AQC0908

Nanopublication — Computational Image Analysis - AQC0908

Claim 1: Computational Image Analysis - AQC0908

K-means clustering analysis [3] (10 colors) performed on artwork C Major [1] - Research on Harmony - Variations 19 (AQC0908) [2] by Arnaud Quercy [2] on 2025-12-11. Documentation includes: color families, texture roughness, brightness distribution, spatial coherence.

Context

Analysis performed according to MMIDS-CMP-2025 [3] includes four metric categories: (1) Color distribution via k-means (10 colors), (2) Texture analysis using Haralick features, (3) Brightness and contrast measurements, (4) Spatial pattern characterization. Source image [5]: 2062x2062 pixels. Analysis date: 2025-12-11.

Color Analysis

Rank Color Hex % Family Name
1 E74308 26.7 orange orangered
2 B98370 15.5 orange rosybrown
3 F05114 14.9 orange chocolate
4 CA917E 13.5 orange darksalmon
5 4F423C 10.1 orange darkslategray
6 E9E8DC 6.7 yellow white
7 BA453F 4.2 red-orange burnt sienna
8 D44E58 4.0 red-orange indianred
9 EFAEAD 3.6 red-orange lightpink
10 47130F 0.8 red-orange very dark red
11 19080D 0.3 red black [Accent]
12 BAB2A9 0.3 yellow-orange steel gray [Accent]

Color Families:

Family %
orange 80.7
red-orange 12.7
yellow 6.7
red 0.3
yellow-orange 0.3

Accent Colors:

Hex Family Name Chroma
19080D red black 8.0
BAB2A9 yellow-orange steel gray 6.1

Texture Analysis

Metric Value
Global Roughness 0.158
Mean Local Roughness 0.015
Roughness Uniformity 0.018
Edge Density 0.03
Mean Gradient Magnitude 0.121
Gradient Variance 0.03
Gradient Smoothness 0.0
Directional Coherence 0.007
Pattern Complexity 0.121
Pattern Repetition 1.0
Detail Frequency Ratio 0.638
Spatial Variation 0.088
Texture Consistency 0.27

Brightness & Contrast Analysis

Metric Value
Mean Brightness 0.513
Brightness Variance 0.158
Brightness Uniformity 0.691
Brightness Skewness 0.74
Brightness Entropy 6.833
Rms Contrast 0.158
Michelson Contrast 1.0
Weber Contrast 0.584
Mean Local Contrast 0.016
Contrast Uniformity 0.0
Dynamic Range 1.0
Effective Dynamic Range 0.616
Shadow Percentage 10.675
Midtone Percentage 77.615
Highlight Percentage 11.709
Shadow Clipping 0.001
Highlight Clipping 0.001
Tonal Balance 0.0
Fine Contrast 0.008
Medium Contrast 0.02
Coarse Contrast 0.029
Multiscale Contrast Ratio 0.273
Edge Contrast 0.121
Contrast Clustering 0.73

Spatial Distribution Analysis

Metric Value
Spatial Coherence 0.783
Color Clustering 0.477
Color Transition Smoothness 0.708
Transition Uniformity 0.8
Sharp Transition Ratio 0.1
Transition Directionality 0.015
Mean Saturation 0.603
Saturation Variance 0.103
Low Saturation Ratio 0.184
Medium Saturation Ratio 0.383
High Saturation Ratio 0.434
Saturation Clustering 0.999
Hue Concentration 0.994
Complementary Balance 0.0
Analogous Dominance 1.0
Temperature Bias 1.0

Methodology

This analysis employs standardized computational methods for objective image characterization. Color extraction uses k-means clustering algorithm. Texture analysis applies Haralick feature extraction. Brightness metrics include mean, variance, and distribution analysis. Spatial patterns are characterized through coherence and clustering measurements. All methods are deterministic and reproducible. Analysis performed by Multimodal Institute's computational imaging systems.

References

[1] Arnaud Quercy (2025). C Major - Research on Harmony - Variations 19 — Catalog raisonné. https://arnaudquercy.art/en/catalogue-raisonne/AQC0908.html

[2] Quercy, A. (2025). Untitled - Gallery. https://artquamanima.com/en/artworks/2025/11/c-major-research-on-harmony-variations-19_id8.html

[3] Quercy, A. (2025). Computational Image Analysis Standard - MMIDS-CMP-2025 https://multimodal.institute/en/publications/2025/11/mmids-cmp-2025-computational-image-analysis-standard-dg1.html

Epistemic profile

Claim typecomputational analysis
Voicethird person
Epistemic statusempirical measurement
Methodologycomputational analysis
Certaintyhigh

Checksum (SHA-256)

a27434194b638bf5512c0172e8847229e2733d95d38eb978df63cfd136c7f555